The Realistic Reasons for Unrealistic Solutions of Pre-Service Primary School Mathematics Teachers in Non-Standard Word Problems: The Example from Turkey / İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Standart Olmayan Dört İşlem Problemlerine Gerçekçi Olma

Çiğdem KILIÇ
953 143

Öz


Problem solving is very important process in mathematics education. There are many different types of mathematical problems in the literature. One of the most important mathematical problems is non-standard word problems. Although its importance many people have issues about that kind of problems. In this study it was aimed to find out the reasons of future mathematics teacher students unrealistic solutions in solving non-standard word problems and their suggestions for overcoming this issue. A paper-pencil test consisting of 12 non-standard problems were implemented 126 pre-service primary school mathematics teachers and based on their solutions, after main data collection task-based interviews were conducted with 12 teacher trainees volunteered. According to the findings of the study culture of schooling, interpretation of problem situation, perceptions of problem solving activities, beliefs in mathematics, previous experience and Turkish exam system were found to be the main reasons for not excluding reality while solving non-standard word problems. 


Tam metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Artut, P. D. and Tarım, K. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının rutin olmayan sözel problemleri çözme süreçlerinin incelenmesi.(Investıgatıon of the prospective teachers’ problem solving process in the nonroutine word problems . Uludag University Education Faculty Journal 12, no.1: 53-70.

Chapman, O. (2003). Teachers' conceptions of mathematical word problems: A Basis for professional development. Paper presented at the 27th international group for the psychology of mathematics education conference held Jointly with the 25th PME-NA conference, July 13-18, in Honolulu, USA.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.,E. and Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th Edt.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Goldin,G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, ed. A. E. Kelly and R. A. Lesh, 517-545. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Commentary solving word problems: A case of modelling?. Learning and Instruction 7, no.4:389-397.

Greer, B. (1993). The modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12: 239-250.

Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction 7, no. 4: 293-307.

Hatano, G. (1997). Commentary cost and benefit of modelling activity. Learning and Instruction 7, no. 4: 383-387.

Holmes, E. E. (1995). New directions in elementary school mathematics: Interactive teaching and learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Merrill.

Hong, E. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions about teaching word problem solving: The effect of methods instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, California.

Inoue, N. (2005). The realistic reasons behind unrealistic solutions: The role of interpretive activity in word problem solving. Learning and Instruction. 15:69-83.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California, New Burry Park:Sage Publication.

MEB, (20059. Yeni ilköğretim matematik dersi (1-5 sınıflar) öğretim programı. Elemenatry school mathematics curriculum (1-5th grades). Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM Publications.

Olkun, S., Şahin, Ö., Akkurt Z., Dikkartın F. T. and Gülbağcı H. (2009). Modelleme yoluyla problem çözme ve genelleme: İlköğretim öğrencileriyle bir çalışma [Problem solving and generalization through modeling: A study on elementary school students]. Education and Science. 34, no.151:65-73.

Öktem, S.,P. (2009). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin gerçekçi cevap gerektiren matematiksel sözel problemleri çözme becerileri [Abilities students for solving mathematical word problem which require actual answer].Master thesis .Çukurova University.

Reusser, K., and Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution – The social rationality of mathematical modelling in schools. Learning and Instruction. 7:309-327.

Schoenfeld, A. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. Informal reasoning and education, ed. J. Voss, D. Perkins and J. Segal., 311-343. Hillsdale, NJ, USA:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Souviney, R. J. (1994). Learning to teach mathematics. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E. and Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modelling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction. 4:273-294.

_______(1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1, no.3:195-229.

Verschaffel, L, De Corte,,E. and Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modelling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4: 339-359.

Wyndhamn, J. and Saljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning. A study of children’s mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4:361-382.

Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L. and De Corte, E. (19979. Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties? Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4:329-338.